Retrospective
Essay
Length:
c. 3-4 (printed) pages
Due:
in my mailbox (second floor of FPH) by 3:30 p.m., Friday,
13December
Task:
Earlier
in the term, you took stock of what you had learned. Now is
the time to complete that process. As you know, the course
was intended to introduce you to both the study of history
in general and the history of the early modern era, in particular;
and further, to help you develop your skills in the areas
of reading and analytical writing.
How
have your ideas about history and the historical method evolved
this semester? Consider in particular your understanding of
the history of communication through writing and print. (Think,
for example, about such issues as authorship, the way that
Renaissance men and women interpreted texts, and so forth).
Formulate your response to the latter question with explicit
reference to the three following texts:
"There are many Antichrists who on account of the assembling
of the peasants, cast scorn upon the gospel, and say: Is
this the fruit of the new teaching, that no one obeys but
all everywhere rise in revolt, and band together to reform,
extinguish, indeed kill the temporal and spiritual authorities.
The following articles will answer these godless and blaspheming
fault-finders. They will first of all remove the reproach
from the word of God and secondly give a Christian excuse
for the disobedience or even the revolt of the entire peasantry
. . . . Therefore, Christian reader, read the following
articles with care, and then judge."
(from
"The Twelve Articles of the peasants,"
in Hillerbrand, ed., The Protestant Reformation,
p. 64)
"You know, Sadoleto, and if you venture to deny, I
will make it palpable to all that you know, yet cunningly
and craftily disguised the fact, not only that our agreement
with antiquity is far closer than yours, but that all we
have attempted has been to renew that ancient form of the
church, which, at first sullied and distorted by illiterate
men of indifferent character, was afterward flagitiously
mangled and almost destroyed by the Roman pontiff and his
faction."
(from
Calvin's "Reply to Sadoleto," in Hillerbrand,
ed., p. 158)
"Thirdly, I base my opinion on the tree of the knowledge
of good and evil; for God himself planted this tree in the
Garden of Eden (Genesis 2:9). Therefore, it may not be uprooted
by any man, an act expressly forbidden by God in Deuteronomy
20:19
..........
"And so says Aristotle in his book, Elenchoi, that
the knowledge of evil is not evil, but rather good and righteous.
..........
[54] "... we may conclude that it is permissible to
read and study good and evil side by side: the evil, so
as to effectively combat it with reason; and the good, strewn
among the evil like roses among thorns, to be extracted
for the sake of our Holy Teachings."
(Johannes
Reuchlin, Recommendation Whether to Confiscate, Destroy
and Burn All Jewish Books, pp., 53, 54)
This is a simple assignment that (if you have kept up with
the work this semester) ought to take up at most a few hours.
You should be able to complete it between the end of our last
class and the end of the week on Friday.
NOTE:
review the "Final
Instructions" before you turn in your work.
|