ETHICS OF SCHOLARSHIP
Hampshire College is part of a broader community of
scholars, a community where ideas, hypotheses, new concepts, and carefully
established facts are the currency. None of us, faculty or students,
is able to survive without borrowing from the work of others. Just
as we expect to have our work recognized in examination reports, reappointments
and promotions, or the footnotes of those who borrow from us, so must
we carefully recognize those from whom we borrow.
Brief guidelines are presented in the next few pages
for the proper acknowledgment of sources upon which we draw for course
papers, examinations, oral presentations, artistic productions, and
so on. We acknowledge the work of others not only in gratitude to
them, but also to provide our readers with the opportunity to consult
our sources if they wish to review the evidence, consider other interpretations,
or to determine the basis for the cited passage. In the evaluation
of scholarly work, the writer’s creativity in locating appropriate
sources and using them well can be assessed only if those sources
are identified.
The failure to acknowledge one’s sources is
more than a failure to be properly socialized into a community of
scholars. Writers who fail to note sources are, at best, ignorant,
and, at worst, dishonest. Unacknowledged borrowing from the work
of others in any medium is a fundamental repudiation of the deepest
values of the academic community.
PLAGIARISM
Plagiarism (from the Latin for “kidnapper”)
is a term covering everything from inadvertently passing off as one’s
own the work of another because of ignorance, time constraints, or
careless note-taking, to hiring a ghost writer to produce an examination
or course paper. This range of possibilities is spelled out in more
detail in the following list of examples.
False Citation
Material should not be attributed to a source from
which that material was not obtained. That is, one must not pass
off primary sources as if they had been consulted when, in fact,
the material in the oral presentation or written work is based upon
a secondary source. The use of secondary source material is permissible
when properly cited.
False Data
Data fabricated or altered in a laboratory experiment
or field project is an instance of academic fraud. While it is not
plagiarism, it is clearly a first cousin and it is not acceptable.
Intentional Poor Documentation
As scholarly writers, we are expected to acknowledge
our indebtedness for phrases, sentences, charts, diagrams, figures,
and for longer verbatim quotations.
Writers prepare for this necessity by taking careful
notes on exact wording and spelling, page numbers, and source identification.
It is particularly important to present verbatim quotations exactly
as they are in the original sources, including any errors. Paraphrases
require documentation, and they must be a true restatement of the
original rather than simply a rearrangement of the words in the sources.
There are a number of methods of documentation.
The form of the reference list or bibliography or footnote style
may vary by discipline. There are a number of style manuals that
describe the documentation rules for various academic disciplines.
Some are in the reference collection at the library.
Papers Written by Others
Presenting papers or sections of papers (including
web sites) bought, borrowed or stolen from others as one’s
own is the most blatant form of plagiarism. There is no conceivable
excuse for this behavior, including ignorance.
Unacknowledged Multiple Authors or Collaboration
The notion that intellectual work is and should
be a lonely and fiercely independent enterprise is overemphasized.
At Hampshire College, students are encouraged to collaborate on
work for courses, examination, and even Division III “independent
study projects.” For example, students are encouraged to
have better spellers look at their work if that is necessary, and
faculty members show drafts of their work or discuss their ideas
with colleagues. In almost any book or article, writers recognize
their indebtedness to colleagues who have criticized their work
in footnotes or reference lists. Students, too, should acknowledge
the assistance of their collaborators. In joint examinations or
class projects, the contributions of each member of the group should
be made clear and every member of the group should have an understanding
of the whole project.
Unacknowledged Multiple Submission
Using the same paper or portions thereof for several
purposes without prior approval (for example, a course at another
college and a Division I examination paper, publication in several
scholarly journals, or submission to several classes) is generally
considered to be illegitimate. However, such multiple submission
is entirely acceptable if that borrowing is agreed to by the parties
involved. It is, in fact, encouraged at Hampshire College when students
want to pursue an idea further or when they have undertaken work
well beyond that required for the original purpose of the paper or
presentation.
ACADEMIC DISHONESTY
Procedures for
dealing with violations
Academic dishonesty (plagiarism, fabrication, or falsification
of data) is a breach of the ethics of scholarship and a violation of
one of the central norms of an academic community. Allegations of academic
dishonesty are most likely to arise from work done in a course or for
a divisional project. The accusation is usually brought by a member
of the college faculty. When it is clear to a faculty member that a
charge of plagiarism is appropriate, the procedure is as follows:
1. Consultation with the School
dean and Dean of Academic Support and Advising: The faculty member
will inform the student, the School dean, and the Dean of Academic
Support and advising of the accusation. Both the faculty member and
the student will meet with the School dean who will a) consult with
the center for academic support and advising to see if there are
previous incidents, b) hear both sides, and c) recommend a course
of action. If the School dean concurs with the charge of academic
dishonesty and determines that it is a first offense, s/he will choose
one of the following options, depending on the seriousness of the
offense:
a. Write a letter of warning
to the student, with a copy to the dean of academic support and
advising; or
b. Refer the matter to the Dean of Academic Support
and Advising, who will write a letter of warning to the student.
In addition to the letter of warning, further sanctions available
at stage 1a. or 1b. may include removal of all record of the course
being taken (in the case of plagiarism in a course paper), or a
decision to set aside the project in question and require the student
to do an alternate project on a different topic with a different
committee (unless the committee concerned agrees to continue working
with the student.)
c. In cases of egregious violation, the School
dean or dean of academic support and advising may refer the case
to the dean of student affairs for disciplinary action, as outlined
below.
2. Referral of the case to the
Dean of Student Services for disciplinary action: Second or multiple
offenses concerning plagiarism or other violations of the ethics
of scholarship (as well as egregious first offenses) will be referred
by the School dean or the dean of academic support and advising to
the Dean of Student Services for further disciplinary action. The
Dean of Student Services will consult with the Dean of the Faculty
in deciding disciplinary action. Sanctions available include disciplinary
probation, suspension, or expulsion from the college.
3. Appeals: The student has the
right to appeal the finding of academic dishonesty and/or disciplinary
sanction to the president.
4. Record of cases of academic
dishonesty: All cases of academic dishonesty should be reported in
writing to the dean of academic support and advising. A record of
all cases will be maintained by the center for academic support and
advising. The center for academic support and advising will be responsible
for monitoring recommended actions and insuring appropriate confidentiality.
The center for academic support and advising will also keep a summary
of all cases, without identifying specifics, to aid in determining
appropriate action.
(The student handbooks of Amherst, Mt. Holyoke, and
Smith Colleges and of Princeton University
were employed extensively
as source material in drafting the above statement on Ethics of Scholarship.)
|