[Note:
This is just a preliminary version, but it should suffice
for the time being.]
[Note:
These pages assume a familiarity with both
basic analytical writing and everyday use of the Web.]
GENERAL
PRINCIPLES
Starting
assumption:
Although all research and writing are in some sense similar,
web pages work differently than paper pages. Accordingly,
the
principal challenge of web design is not technical: It is
conceptual.
Preliminary
planning:
As
in the case of any written term paper or other academic exercise:
(1)
Determine the essential facts and arguments that you
wish to convey (in general/all things being equal). Then determine
to what extent the following two considerations facilitate
or complicate attainment of that goal:
(2)
Consider the relation between what you wish to say and what
your target audience already knows and is capable of
understanding. Or, to use the language of literary criticism,
who is your intended reader?
(3)
Consider the strengths or drawbacks of your genre or vehicle
of communication.
Print media vary widely in tone, intellectual difficulty,
writing style, amount of available space, etc. (consider the
difference between scholarly and popular writing, books and
journals, etc.). Web sites, too, display wide variations.
Our principal concern, though, is with the difference between
print and the Web.
The
distinctiveness of the Web
bears in particular on points (2) and (3):
Studies show that vistors to Web pages (for better or
worse):
tend
to "scan" (rather than "read" in asupposedlytraditional
manner)
expect visual aids (layout, formatting, images)
to guide the eye to what is most important
are impatient with large amounts of plain text
Accordingly, studies further show that the most
effective Web treatments of a given topic tend to be only
about half as long as the equivalent print version. In
fact, after a typical Web page has been radically edited down,
readers often insist that it contains more information
than it did earlier.
Result:
the
Web rewards economical expression.
drawbacks:
Selection
and organization are crucial to any piece of writing,
but they are arguably more important and more difficult
on the Web due to the emphasis on brevity. Web-surfers
tend to be unforgiving.
advantages:
(1)
One can make a virtue of a necessity:
By
forcing you to make ruthless choices in subject matter (what
to include or exclude), arrangement (where to put it), and
wording, Web design teaches you intellectual discipline.
You can easily apply the lessons to your traditional
print essays.
(2)
Although the Web demands great discipline, it also rewards
you with a degree of flexibility unmatched by print,
thanks to its
ability to include multiple levels. The farther down
you travel from the austere top pages of a site, the more
freedom and space you will find.
Because
one can write and read in non-linear fashion, you and
the reader can go off on as many tangents as you wish without
precluding the option of sticking to the straight and narrow
(for other readers, or for the same reader on another occasion).
Links have an additional advantage: Unlike a reference
note in a print work, a link can take you to the whole source
itself, and not merely to a title. A scholarly site could
in principle contain is own vast library of source material.
Two outstanding examples are The
Valley of the Shadow: Two American Communities in the Civil
War and Do
History (based on the prizewinning biography of a New
England midwife in the Revolutionary and Early National era).
|
|
Lay
out your site accordingly |
|